Skip to main content

Most of the Cloud Business Models Have Been Wrong

Many Cloud startups have built their business models assuming that the cost of acquiring a customer can be recouped in a reasonable amount of time through recurring revenue.   These calculations based on Customer Acquisition Costs (CAC) and Long Term Value of the customers (LTV) have omitted a major factor in running a recurring revenue business – Customer Management Costs (CMC).  As a result, a lot of the Cloud Startups are overvalued because investors incorrectly assume there will be little or no marginal cost to maintain recurring revenue from existing customers.

One of the popular resources (  talks about this problem in calculating LTV: “However in most SaaS businesses, the gross margin % is high (above 80%), and it’s quite common to use the simpler version of the formula that is not Gross Margin adjusted.” A few other popular resources like Kissmetrics blog ( continue making this mistake:

That means you first have to know how long most customers stay with you. It could be six months, 12 months or longer. Then you multiply the monthly revenue you expect from that customer and you get the LTV.
Keep in mind that you should include any expenses related to installation or maintenance of your product.

If you read most startup business blog posts and go to the startup bootcamps there is little to no mention of customer success and customer service.  Everyone talks about simplicity and how you need to do a better job designing your systems.  There is an illusion that your customers will just get going and virally adopt your software within their organization.  The truth is that adopting a new software system goes way beyond just creating an account or putting some data “in the cloud.” There are a lot of elements of using a system starting from legacy data migration, to connecting to other systems, setting up information architecture, configuring the system, training existing and new employees, managing permissions and a myriad of other things.  Sure, the cloud has vastly improved costs related to installation, upgrades and patching of the systems, but the rest of the problems have not gone away.

In the early days of startups, the founding team and the energized early employees deliver these additional services and basically mask the CMC numbers.  It’s important for the technical teams, sales and marketing teams to stay close to the customers and learn about the usage.  The software does improve over time and possibly some of the customer management activities can be automated.  However, anyone who thinks that you can sell someone a system and without any account management just perpetually get recurring revenue forever hasn’t been in this business long enough.

There are a few great products that require little help – Dropbox, Slack, Google Docs.  These apps are in a well understood space and are building on existing knowledge.  Folks who used Microsoft Office largely understand what they need and how to use word processing and spreadsheets.  Anyone who was in the corporate world with file servers gets what’s basically an externally hosted (Cloud) file server does for them.   Anyone who used chat rooms growing up can get going with a corporate chat room from Slack.  Most of the other Cloud Services are a non-starter without some amount of implementation, rollout and ongoing management.

If startups do not account for CMC and just do not provide help and support, they are running into danger of failing to get usage and adoption.  No usage or adoption mean no recurring revenue.  Sooner or later people stop paying for the things they don’t get value from.

The chart above is a simplified model that explains this common miscalculation.  The CAC is $300 while at $19/mo the unadjusted LTV makes the customer profitable 17 months later.  When added a cost of just one support call or one account management check-in a month at the value of $10 the CMC starts adding up, so the true customer costs (TCC) keeps being above the LTV for close to three years.  All of this is of course without the up front costs of building the software.

The Cloud and recurring revenue model are in their infancy.  There are great strides to simplify and provide a better self service experience, but it will be a long time before entire organizations just virally adopt business software without any help.  Until then – adjust your expectations.


PS: if you liked this article you might also enjoy So you want to start a mobile app business...

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SDET / QA Engineer Interview Checklist

After interviewing and hiring hundreds of engineers over the past 12+  years I have come up with a few checklists.  I wanted to share one of those with you so you could conduct comprehensive interviews of QA Engineers for your team.

I use this checklist when I review incoming resumes and during the interview.  It keeps me from missing areas that ensure a good team and technology fit.  I hope you make good use of them.  If you think there are good questions or topics that I have missed - get in touch with me!

SDE/T or QA Engineer interview checklist from Mike Borozdin
If you like this checklist you might want to check out these posts:
Emotional Intelligence in Software Teams  and Good-bye manual tester, hello crowdsourcing!

Chief Collaboration Officer

When you search for the word “collaboration” on the Internet, the top hits are mostly software packages you can buy.  Software can facilitate collaboration, but it doesn’t make people collaborate on its own.

One of the key functions of a technical leader is to bring a team together, help people share ideas, and facilitate team members helping each other.  When a software leader overlooks this key function, you end up with a group of individual contributing engineers instead of a cohesive team.
Before we get into tactics, we should ask “Why is collaboration important for an engineering team?” 
It’s critical to examine your assumptions, so here are my reasons for why a group of engineers working on their own are worse than a team working together: Smart people learn from each other.Getting your plans and designs reviewed by other people allows you to leverage their experience and check your assumptions.Collaboration produces artifacts that stay after collaboration has taken place (such…

Hire Fast, Fire Fast? Not so Fast.

Silicon Valley is full of advice and it frequently comes from people who have little experience on the subject matter.  A popular topic surrounds hiring and terminations with the king catch phrase being: “Hire Fast, Fire Fast.”  To me, what that usually means is lack of diligence, thought, communication and courage.

When hiring people love going with their gut feel, often with disastrous results.  There is an obvious subject of diversity of thought, appearance and background.  When thinking “fast” you are probably hiring people like yourself because humans quickly react to people who they believe are in their tribe.

A startup that lacks the resources of a big company often becomes so desperate to get technical staff that when a decent candidate comes along, excitement ensues and the employer doesn't slow down to put them through a more rigorous hiring process.

I highly encourage technical founders and engineering executives to write out their precise hiring process.  Of course, y…