Skip to main content

Win a Prize at Your Next Hackathon

Simple Invoice App on the AppStoreA couple of weeks ago I decided to participate in the TechCrunch Disrupt Hackathon. My app, Simple Invoice (www.sendsimpleinvoice.com), ended up winning a prize.  I think if I hadn’t already learned about the vendors’ APIs and come up with some ideas before the Hackathon I would never have had a chance.  Here are a few tips for you to win your next Hackathon!

Think ahead. First and foremost, take a look at the Hackathon website and learn about the sponsors ahead of time.  If the first time you learn about the sponsor APIs is during the event, you are probably behind.  That’s the big reason why popular APIs like DropBox, Twilio, and Twitter always get a lot of hacks – people already know them and might even have some code stashed somewhere.

IoT > Mobile > Web. The second tip is to use hardware if you can help it.  In terms of the things that are most likely to win prizes, I have noticed that wearable technology is perceived more advanced than mobile apps, which in turn generally beat pure web apps.  If you have a choice between building then keep in mind that IoT > Mobile > Web.

Involve technical evangelists. Next tip: always involve the evangelists from the API companies.  They can help you; they can debug their own code and they can guide you in the right direction.  Don’t forget that they want you to be successful because a great app using their platform gets them on stage and in the news!

I worked closely with Evo Snap team and they helped me quite a bit.  They have several different APIs and one was easier to call from iOS than another.  They were also able to give me internal error codes when I couldn’t figure out why my parameters didn’t work.  Without their involvement I wouldn’t have been able to complete my app in time.

Practice your pitch. Practice your presentation and make sure that you can deliver it in less than the allotted time.  It’s always good to have a few extra seconds to add a joke in if you think of something funny.  At TechCrunch Disrupt, we had 60 seconds per presentation.  Here is a link to my pitch – I tried to waste zero time:
http://techcrunch.com/video/simple-invoice-presents-at-techcrunch-disrupt-hackathon/518403996/

A good app with a bad presentation is unlikely to win.  The judges do not have time to go through all of the apps, so they will likely only pay attention to the ones that caught their attention during the first round of presentations.

Establish a web presence. The last thing is to hire a designer and direct part of his/her time into putting together a one page website.  I grabbed a template and put together quick information on a one page website: www.sendsimpleinvoice.com.  The template cost me $13 and I just filled out all the info.  Between registering a domain and launching the site on Digital Ocean, I only spent a couple of hours on the whole thing.

Good luck in your next Hackathon! They are fun, they are winnable, and they offer a great opportunity to learn about new technologies.

PS:  you can download my app here https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/send-simple-invoice/id917501386
PPS: If you liked this post you might want to check out the post about using Test Flight and about Starting a Mobile App Business.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Quality of Code is Quality of Life

About 20 years ago when I started working in technology companies I remember “the best” engineers had similar patterns:
-They worked crazy hours
-They knew the systems no one else knew
-They could react and deliver something faster than anyone else
You could always hear other employees say: “Bob is really smart, no one knows how to get anything done in system X besides him!”

This reinforced optimization around being the only person who knew how to do something in some part of the code.  That in turn reinforced job security and bargaining for those engineers, but also chained them to a particular system.  We had big code bases of C++ or Java code where some “Bob” hacked up features as soon as he possibly could.  “Bob” would have occasional nuclear disasters where he’d sleep in the office or through the weekend and then everyone would thank him for how he “saved the day.”  “Bob” sacrificed his quality of life to get praise when he hacked stuff up quickly and then the second time when n…

SDET / QA Engineer Interview Checklist

After interviewing and hiring hundreds of engineers over the past 12+  years I have come up with a few checklists.  I wanted to share one of those with you so you could conduct comprehensive interviews of QA Engineers for your team.

I use this checklist when I review incoming resumes and during the interview.  It keeps me from missing areas that ensure a good team and technology fit.  I hope you make good use of them.  If you think there are good questions or topics that I have missed - get in touch with me!


SDE/T or QA Engineer interview checklist from Mike Borozdin
If you like this checklist you might want to check out these posts:
Emotional Intelligence in Software Teams  and Good-bye manual tester, hello crowdsourcing!

Code versus Configuration

At Ethos we are building a distributed mortgage origination system and in mortgage there is a lot of
different user types with processes that vary depending on geography.  One of our ongoing discussions is about how much of the logic resides in code vs. being in a workflow system or configuration.  After researching this topic for a bit, I have arrived at a conclusion that the logic should live outside of code very infrequently, which might come as a surprise to a lot of enterprise software engineers.

Costs of configuration files and workflow engines First thing that I assume is true is that having any logic outside of the code has costs associated with it.  Debugging highly configurable system involves not only getting the appropriate branch from source control, you also need to make sure that the right configuration values or the database.  In most cases this is harder for programmers to deal with.  In many FinTech companies where the production data is not made readily accessible…