Skip to main content

The #1 mistake in Agile Project Management

It’s been over 12 years since I read the life-changing Agile Software Development with Scrum by Ken Schwaber and Mike Beedle. I’ve been a big proponent of Agile in every organization I’ve worked with since, including Microsoft and DocuSign. Now, in the position of directing 4 engineering teams that execute Scrum in parallel, I continuously see one mistake that almost all agile practitioners make: they think that taking the Agile approach means they don’t need a plan.

Engineers who use Scrum or Kanban often hesitate when it comes to long-term roadmaps. The most common rebuttal: “this is not agile! We’re going to plan one sprint, adjust our backlog, then re-evaluate in two weeks.” Of course this see-what-happens style of project management appeals to engineers, but it doesn’t work very well for big projects that require marketing, partnerships, customer rollouts, or other external coordination. This a frequent predicament.

Then the question arises: how do you reconcile Agile development with planning a marketing blitz or roadshow 6 months in advance? An engineer can’t just tell the marketing team, “we don’t know what features we will have in the product... we don’t know when they’re going to be done... we’re just going to go sprint by sprint and we’ll let you know what we’ve created by then.”

The answer for synchronizing Agile with planning is to shift the perception of what Agile means. Contrary to common assumption, being Agile is not based on an inherent lack of planning. Rather, Agile is about getting feedback as quickly as possible and adjusting plans accordingly.

Early in my Agile career, someone gave me a useful analogy. It goes like this:
Just like with driving, software development is full of surprises. There are virtual detours, stop lights, crazy drivers, and flat tires.  And just like with driving, a virtual detour doesn’t mean you’re not going to arrive at your destination. It does mean, though, that you might need to drive a little faster to make up for lost time or let your friends know that you’ll be a few hours late.  
The beauty of Agile is that it encourages engineers to identify surprises as early as possible and adjust plans accordingly. That way, software teams don’t leave their colleagues hanging at the last minute or waste months pursuing the wrong goals.
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SDET / QA Engineer Interview Checklist

After interviewing and hiring hundreds of engineers over the past 12+  years I have come up with a few checklists.  I wanted to share one of those with you so you could conduct comprehensive interviews of QA Engineers for your team.

I use this checklist when I review incoming resumes and during the interview.  It keeps me from missing areas that ensure a good team and technology fit.  I hope you make good use of them.  If you think there are good questions or topics that I have missed - get in touch with me!


SDE/T or QA Engineer interview checklist from Mike Borozdin
If you like this checklist you might want to check out these posts:
Emotional Intelligence in Software Teams  and Good-bye manual tester, hello crowdsourcing!

Hire Fast, Fire Fast? Not so Fast.

Silicon Valley is full of advice and it frequently comes from people who have little experience on the subject matter.  A popular topic surrounds hiring and terminations with the king catch phrase being: “Hire Fast, Fire Fast.”  To me, what that usually means is lack of diligence, thought, communication and courage.

When hiring people love going with their gut feel, often with disastrous results.  There is an obvious subject of diversity of thought, appearance and background.  When thinking “fast” you are probably hiring people like yourself because humans quickly react to people who they believe are in their tribe.

A startup that lacks the resources of a big company often becomes so desperate to get technical staff that when a decent candidate comes along, excitement ensues and the employer doesn't slow down to put them through a more rigorous hiring process.

I highly encourage technical founders and engineering executives to write out their precise hiring process.  Of course, y…

Pull Requests and Code Reviews

Software development involves a great deal of collaboration.  One of the most basic blocks of collaboration on a software development team is a code review.  There have been many different ways of doing code reviews over time, some of this has been dictated by the tools available.  Git and online source collaboration tools created a set of best practices that are worthwhile of adopting on any team.

About a month ago I have looked at various articles about how to best create a Pull Request (PR) and do a code review and the attached presentation is the result of this research.  The presentation can help you guide your team and develop a set of collaboration practices that works for your particular situation.

It’s good to start out with why to seek a code review.  Having clarity about your intentions helps you guide the person helping you with code reviews and also to manage your expectations about you can get out of the code review.  The reasons for seeking a code review are generally …