Skip to main content

Hiring: Technical Evangelist in San Francisco / Bay Area

Technical Evangelist

DocuSign, Inc.
San Francisco, CA, United States
Full-Time

A successful TE would be able to articulate the benefits of DocuSign service to a wide variety of audiences from CTO to an individual Software Engineer. Internally TE’s responsibility would be to influence DocuSign product strategy through knowledge of software vendors, system integrators and technological landscape.

The position will be measured by:
1) DocuSign API and protocol adoption in the marketplace
2) DocuSign service awareness among outside software developers
3) Partner satisfaction
4) Revenue resulting from integrated solutions

Position Requirements:

1) Self-direction and proven ability to identify technical trends.
2) Passion for learning new technologies in various technology stacks: Linux, Force.com, iPhone, Android and others.
3) Existing knowledge of how to create a solution in 2 or more of the technology stacks using various programming languages such as: PHP, Python, Ruby, Java and Apex Code.
4) At least 3 years of commercial experience as a Software Engineer, Product Manager or Program Manager.
5) Communication experience with a record of public speaking, writing, Facebook, twitter and blogging on technical topics.
6) Personality: positive attitude, ability to energize software developers and IT professionals, fair and balanced approach to technology.
7) Education: Bachelor of Science in Computer Science or Computer Engineering is required. Graduate degree in business or computer science is a plus.
8) Language: Must be fluent in English both verbal and written.

http://jobvite.com/m?3AIf1fwi

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Quality of Code is Quality of Life

About 20 years ago when I started working in technology companies I remember “the best” engineers had similar patterns:
-They worked crazy hours
-They knew the systems no one else knew
-They could react and deliver something faster than anyone else
You could always hear other employees say: “Bob is really smart, no one knows how to get anything done in system X besides him!”

This reinforced optimization around being the only person who knew how to do something in some part of the code.  That in turn reinforced job security and bargaining for those engineers, but also chained them to a particular system.  We had big code bases of C++ or Java code where some “Bob” hacked up features as soon as he possibly could.  “Bob” would have occasional nuclear disasters where he’d sleep in the office or through the weekend and then everyone would thank him for how he “saved the day.”  “Bob” sacrificed his quality of life to get praise when he hacked stuff up quickly and then the second time when n…

SDET / QA Engineer Interview Checklist

After interviewing and hiring hundreds of engineers over the past 12+  years I have come up with a few checklists.  I wanted to share one of those with you so you could conduct comprehensive interviews of QA Engineers for your team.

I use this checklist when I review incoming resumes and during the interview.  It keeps me from missing areas that ensure a good team and technology fit.  I hope you make good use of them.  If you think there are good questions or topics that I have missed - get in touch with me!


SDE/T or QA Engineer interview checklist from Mike Borozdin
If you like this checklist you might want to check out these posts:
Emotional Intelligence in Software Teams  and Good-bye manual tester, hello crowdsourcing!

Code versus Configuration

At Ethos we are building a distributed mortgage origination system and in mortgage there is a lot of
different user types with processes that vary depending on geography.  One of our ongoing discussions is about how much of the logic resides in code vs. being in a workflow system or configuration.  After researching this topic for a bit, I have arrived at a conclusion that the logic should live outside of code very infrequently, which might come as a surprise to a lot of enterprise software engineers.

Costs of configuration files and workflow engines First thing that I assume is true is that having any logic outside of the code has costs associated with it.  Debugging highly configurable system involves not only getting the appropriate branch from source control, you also need to make sure that the right configuration values or the database.  In most cases this is harder for programmers to deal with.  In many FinTech companies where the production data is not made readily accessible…