Skip to main content

What to do about being tracked online?

Advertisers have been talking about the improvement in ad targeting and how it benefits everyone, yet consumers ask not to be tracked.  In real life we appreciate it when someone pays attention and tailors their messaging to us, why not online?  Can something be done to fix it?

We get profiled in real life all the time.  Some of that is welcome, some of it is not and some of it is illegal.  A lot of the profiling is due to our conscious choice.  Those who drive a Ferrari know that people perceive them differently than those who drive a Prius.  

What is broken in online tracking is that the user has no clue and no control over how they are being tracked.  A few years ago a friend of mine sent me a link to check out a dress from one of the new fashion designers. The designer had a very edgy name.  Later in the week I was doing a demo to a customer in the same browser and had a big banner on the side of a young woman in a revealing dress with a raunchy tagline.  I felt out of control and it was an unnecessary distraction. Thankfully everyone got a chuckle out of it and we moved on.  I had no choice but to go clean out my cookies and history to see if that’ll help.

We have the technology to give users the control they need.  Google already has a screen for ad preferences, but it’s too hard to figure out why a particular ad is shown.  Apple and Firefox are starting to block what apps and website can share between them, but that stops the good and the bad ad targeting.  Governments started forcing websites to ask people whether they want to accept cookies, but cookies are a base technology on the web and regular consumers don’t understand what they are being asked.  

What if ad networks provided a link on their ads that explains to the user why they are seeing it.  The explanation can then take the user to the right preferences screen? It’s possible that ad networks that do not have that traceability might perform better than the ones that do.  This is where ad networks should welcome some regulation.  Leveling the playing field will ensure that everyone plays by the same rules.  The regulation doesn’t have to be technology specific like the cookies law, which is turning out to be pretty useless.  It can just simply state that any advertisement shown needs to have a link that explains why its shown and the ability to turn it off or erase that setting.  Giving the control back to users can help the large ad companies shake off the creepiness aura they have and make everyone a little bit happier.


Popular posts from this blog

SDET / QA Engineer Interview Checklist

After interviewing and hiring hundreds of engineers over the past 12+  years I have come up with a few checklists.  I wanted to share one of those with you so you could conduct comprehensive interviews of QA Engineers for your team. I use this checklist when I review incoming resumes and during the interview.  It keeps me from missing areas that ensure a good team and technology fit.  I hope you make good use of them.  If you think there are good questions or topics that I have missed - get in touch with me! SDE/T or QA Engineer interview checklist from Mike Borozdin If you like this checklist you might want to check out these posts: Emotional Intelligence in Software Teams   and  Good-bye manual tester, hello crowdsourcing!

Code versus Configuration

At Ethos we are building a distributed mortgage origination system and in mortgage there is a lot of different user types with processes that vary depending on geography.  One of our ongoing discussions is about how much of the logic resides in code vs. being in a workflow system or configuration.  After researching this topic for a bit, I have arrived at a conclusion that the logic should live outside of code very infrequently, which might come as a surprise to a lot of enterprise software engineers. Costs of configuration files and workflow engines First thing that I assume is true is that having any logic outside of the code has costs associated with it.  Debugging highly configurable system involves not only getting the appropriate branch from source control, you also need to make sure that the right configuration values or the database.  In most cases this is harder for programmers to deal with.  In many FinTech companies where the production data is not made readily acce

Intuitive Programming - Comments

Comments are a topic of vibrant discussion.  Ever since programmers could leave some text in the program that was ignored by the machine the debate started: “what’s a good comment, what’s a bad comment, why comment?” There are endless instructions to programmers that say many of the following things: 1) Describe your function! 2) Don’t write in the comment what you wrote in the code. 3) Tell people why you are doing what you are doing. What I think has been missing from this discourse is the audience for comments and through those audiences there is intent.  The code is being read, skimmed or analyzed by people and tools.  So what are the audiences and reading modes? 1) Maintaining and enhancing the code 2) Skimming through the entire module or file to figure out what the overall structure is 3) Reviewing the test files to check out the test coverage and edge cases 4) Seeing the docstrings of functions while being in a separate file altogether 5) Reviewi